Which of the following is NOT an acceptable form of rental payment history verification?

A receipt for rent payment that is signed by the landlord may not be considered an acceptable form of rental payment history verification because it typically represents only a single transaction rather than a comprehensive account of the tenant’s payment history. While it can provide proof of a specific payment, it does not capture the entirety of the rental payment history required for a thorough evaluation.

In contrast, the other options provide more extensive documentation. A VOR (Verification of Rent) form, when completed by the landlord, encompasses detailed information about the tenant's rental payment history, including the consistency and timeliness of payments. Similarly, a rental ledger signed and dated by the landlord gives a complete view of all payments made over time, including dates and amounts, which is essential for verifying a tenant's reliability. Lastly, lease agreements paired with cancelled checks, front and back, collectively confirm not only the rental terms but also show evidence of payment, as cancelled checks demonstrate that the payments were processed, and the lease outlines the agreed-upon amount.

Thus, the most robust forms of verification, which provide a full picture of a tenant's rental payment behavior, are preferable to a signed receipt for a single payment.